Reliability of Cork Cobh Services
 

The grapevine is telling us that there have been a fair few cancellations on the Cork Cobh in recent days

Anyone out there in cyberspace have experience of this?

Over Christmas there was a notice in Cobh station saying that the 19.30 & 20.30 ex cobh were replaced by buses and so presumably the 19.00 and 20.00 ex Cork would be buses as well.
I used the train quiet a few times over Christmas and they were generally very punctual with only 5 minute delays on the evening rush hour ones from mallow, this was caused by the CDE sitting on platform 4 and so forcing both the Cobh and Mallow bound trains to use platform 5, I don't know where the crossover is on the north side of Cork, is it in the tunnel or further out????

On a different subject sombody has laid some blue electrical cable on stakes along the Midleton track from Cobh Junction.

Just between the station and the tunnel in the open section / under the bridge.

I imagine there is another north of the tunnel.

Screw the crossover. Who cares!

All Dublin bound services are working the new timetable now. However this is as a result of some Mallow and Cobh services being cancelled, with continued bus substitution. In order to protect the integrity of Cork - Dublin services, IE management have conceeded to Driver wishes on rosters. (amazing how they couldn't do that a month ago:confused: ) For the next 2 weeks at least, local Cork services will be disrupted as drivers are rostered to intercity services. After that Dublin crews will be used to bring balance to the disputed roster, with a final solution planned after that.

Keep an eye on the IE web site to see if they mention cancelled cobh services on Sunday mornings.

There are also reports of crossing keepers not working the new timetable as management failed to engage with them in relation to changes in working hours.

From Breaking News - Sunday 17th February 2008

http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/mheysnmhkfsn/

Its not industrial action, working your agreed work and nothing more is fully legal

The question to ask is why Irish Rail pushed ahead with a timetable without staff agreement

Sorry, but the unions/staff do not run the company (or should not). I work in the public sector, and when my timetable changes, I am expected to get on with it.

But does your timetable work around overtime? I know that some companies do place an onus on OT for staff, but is this a mandatory requirement for CIE Staff? I thought that was option? If that was the case, then you cannot blame staff for not taking up the option....

That depends on the contract, if it says you have to work x you have to work x, while I was in the private sector my contract clearly stated my hours of work, with little tolerance.

However where there is a long standing practice of rosters being agreed and voted on before introduction it is bad business to publicly commit to services which there is no agreement to run.

One of the key issues ongoing here is not strictly the rosters but the fact staff are being put under pressure to work rest days to cover for the lack of staff, thats what is cancelling the 6:30 and 17:35 trains.

Drivers are entitled to have 2 days a week off one of which is to fall on a weekend, there is a hint at a need to work possibly 6 rest days a year, in a safety driven business rest days are important, note the strict regulations applied to aircraft pilots, its the same kind of thing, the first thing you will see in most rail accident reports is the shift pattern of the drivers involved

Can I qoute from the Breaking News item referred to earlier: "Some drivers at Cork station are refusing to operate the new schedule and are continuing to operate the old one."

This implies that it is newly-timetabled trains which are bsing singled out, and not simply overtime being refused. Unless of course it just happens that trains new to the timetable are those which also involve overtime or rest-day working, etc. Somehow, this seems to be a bit of a co-incidence. I would still maintain that the ethos of a Union-run company is what we have in IE, and that it is not how things should be run.

Of course you need competent management as well.......

The new services require more staff to work than before, so there is a need for an extra driver to drive one of the Sunday morning Cork Dublin Cork runs

The issue of Cork - Cobh is more a case of prioritisation to avoid canceling Dublin Cork trains

Its not some staff in Cork, its a lot of staff in Cork, Dublin and possibly Limerick. Thanks to the Ennis line being closed Limerick hasn't been a problem.

If the staff aren't rested fully there is a higher risk of accidents, staff angry at rosters, proceedures and so are not likely to be the most customer friendly either. Happy rested staff are better for passengers.

Basic fact is Irish Rail don't have enough drivers to cover the services without going to overtime and rest days. Its been a serious ongoing problem for years in Dublin. The closed shop recruitment policy prevents fully quailified drivers from other EU countries (particularly the UK) directly entering the driving grade, an NIR driver fully quailified would have to sweep platforms first and apply despite being certified to drive on the Irish Rail rule book.

Anyone remember the winter of madness 2000/2001 when the DART went nuts due to driver shortages, IE had to completely change the recruitment policies to make it much easier to drive a DART.

Now we seem to be getting to the nub of the matter: "The closed shop recruitment policy prevents fully quailified drivers from other EU countries (particularly the UK) directly entering the driving grade, an NIR driver fully quailified would have to sweep platforms first and apply despite being certified to drive on the Irish Rail rule book".

Will anyone challenge this, in the courts, or somewhere in the EU bureaucracy? Given that we are making comparisons with airline pilots, it's truly bizzare and indefensible.

EU are addressing this through a certification arrangement

Closed shop arrangement are not illegal

However beyond the basic skills of controlling a train things are very different in the rest of Europe in terms of proceedure. UK and Irish practice are still very similar though Irish Rail has an edge on some safety features

Passenger don't care about how a driver gets to be a driver, they just need to be reassured there are a enough of them to provide a full timetable

Just like the trains we don't know if the meeting actually happened

Is that a safety or contract thing? The Organization of Working Time Act 1997 gives 2 days off a fortnight.

The rest day arrangement is agreed by IE, the unions and signed off on by a third party safety consultancy

I have the bones of the agreement buried somewhere, its quite clear

Working time act sets down the absolute minmum standards

"A happy railway is a safe railway" as they say.

Exactly, also has a positive impact on passenger experience

While we are a passenger representive group, safety comes before everything else