While not disagreeing with the broad thrust of your argument on this, why is it that your posts in these circumstances Mark frequently seems to descend to tabloid style?
Is it not possible to make your point in an intelligent and effective manner without descending into tabloid style writing such as referring to the NTA as "goofs" and "geniuses"?
Frankly I think RUI demeans itself by this sort of shoddy style, and will only end up looking unprofessional.
Your argument could have been made in a far more professional manner.
It's a pity as the NTA have a case to answer on this.
|