View Single Post
Unread 19-07-2016, 12:25   #3
Inniskeen
Really Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 951
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Shields View Post
Not just potential stations, I would worry about alignments, and possible widening of existing alignments. A lot of land next to the Northern line was developed in the '90s and '00s that will make any future 4-tracking difficult, for example.

I expect the Metro North alignment is safe enough, but every effort should be made to protect alignment for future extension further north.

James
Hugely important to protect alignments and land adjacent to the main routes which could be used for extra tracks.

Particularly important on the Northern line where IR, NTA etc appear to have been asleep on the job and as a consequence infill developments have been allowed to compromise future capacity.

If the height of ambition for heavy rail is to have everything trundling around at 20 mph then the current approach should work well enough although of course passengers travelling much more than 10 to 12 miles will probably do by road other than during periods of intense congestion.
Inniskeen is offline   Reply With Quote