Rail Users Ireland Forum

Go Back   Rail Users Ireland Forum > Luas Customer Service Issues > Luas Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Unread 13-01-2016, 19:39   #1
berneyarms
Really Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 602
Default Luas Strike Dates Announced

http://www.rte.ie/news/2016/0113/759919-luas/

SIPTU have announced two 48-hour strikes in February on the following dates:


Thursday 11 February & Friday 12 February

Thursday 18 February & Friday 19 February.



Interestingly the report states that Transdev expect to incur a loss of €700k in 2015 - not quite the rosy picture many people paint about LUAS.
berneyarms is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 13-01-2016, 20:07   #2
Dublin13
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 130
Default

Very political.
Dublin13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 13-01-2016, 20:38   #3
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

To note the legal structure here

Transdev operate the Luas under a contract from the NTA via the RPA. This is pretty much a fixed price contract with options for bonus/penalties.

The RPA pay Transdev. Transdev's internal finances are pretty much beyond the concern of the RPA and NTA.

RPA are exposed to the market conditions, if demand falls RPA take the bulk of the hit, if demand rises then they do well as does Transdev as they should get a cut of the extra.

So for Transdev to make more money
1. Beat the contract targets
2. Eliminate fare evasion
3. Drive passenger growth
Mark Gleeson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 13-01-2016, 23:39   #4
Jamie2k9
Really Really Regluar Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
Default

With the wages RPU staff are looking for I bet it would be more cost effective to sack them and allow whatever level of non paying passengers continue.
Jamie2k9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 14-01-2016, 20:16   #5
markpb
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie2k9 View Post
With the wages RPU staff are looking for I bet it would be more cost effective to sack them and allow whatever level of non paying passengers continue.
It would only be cost effective until the NTA realise a key part of the NTA-Transdev isn't being enforced and fine Transdev accordingly.
markpb is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 19-01-2016, 10:59   #6
Thomas J Stamp
Chairman/Publicity
 
Thomas J Stamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie2k9 View Post
With the wages RPU staff are looking for I bet it would be more cost effective to sack them and allow whatever level of non paying passengers continue.
all highly illegal though.
__________________
We are the passengers
Thomas J Stamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 19-01-2016, 11:00   #7
Thomas J Stamp
Chairman/Publicity
 
Thomas J Stamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
Default

the WRC (not that one) has invited them all round for coffee and biscuits.
__________________
We are the passengers
Thomas J Stamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 14-02-2016, 20:48   #8
Colm Moore
Local Liaison Officer
 
Colm Moore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
Default

This seems to be more about the election (and 'The Revolution') than a genuine negotiation for a pay increase.

While pay increases over the last 8 year might be modest, the cost of living is in the same place as then.

Train drivers wanted to be treated the same as airline pilots, tram drivers want to be treated the same as train drivers and there is a suggestion that bus drivers will lodge a pay claim to match tram drivers.
__________________
Colm Moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 15-02-2016, 17:15   #9
Jamie2k9
Really Really Regluar Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
Default

8 and 17 March are the next dates.
Jamie2k9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 15-02-2016, 17:57   #10
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

Transdev are now at serious risk of contract termination through non performance.

I can see this dragging on and on and Transdev are not going to negotiate until SIPTU adopts a financially realistic position.
Mark Gleeson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 15-02-2016, 18:21   #11
Jamie2k9
Really Really Regluar Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
Default

Quote:
Transdev are now at serious risk of contract termination through non performance.

I can see this dragging on and on and Transdev are not going to negotiate until SIPTU adopts a financially realistic position.
It will really be 17 March before Transdev start to lose anything when you take the bonus/regular wage and balance it against fines.

I cannot see the contract been terminated at all, simple fact is if they terminate it they will find it difficult to get another company in to operate with such demands. The NTA know the consequences of for example letting CIE manage short term combined with the additional cost a new operator will demand to meet wage demands.

The sync in me think's SIPTU were expecting it to be resolved before the election and now that has not happened they have been forced to give another 3 weeks notice and once this week's over it will almost be forgotten it will become a non issue and they will have to be realistic at some point. Now they have opted for single days as they know next to nobody is on there side.

What would be the chances of unions agreeing to 3 week notice within CIE?
Jamie2k9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 16-02-2016, 10:11   #12
Thomas J Stamp
Chairman/Publicity
 
Thomas J Stamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
Default

the problem with doing this during an election from SIPTU's point of view is that Transdev/NTA isnt CIE. the tactic of pressurising the minister to intervene either overtly or in the background isnt going to work.

choosing st patricks day and days of matches and so on also sounds grand on paper but it is 100% capable of severe backlash, with passengers going from innocent bystanders to deliberate victims of the striking workers.
__________________
We are the passengers
Thomas J Stamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:09.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.