Rail Users Ireland Forum

Go Back   Rail Users Ireland Forum > General Information & Discussion > Events, Happenings and Media
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Unread 11-01-2008, 15:16   #1
ThomasJ
Member
 
ThomasJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 2,812
Default [Article] Broadstone again

In todays Independent

Quote:
CIE halts access to land in turf war over Luas extension

By Michael Brennan Political Correspondent
Friday January 11 2008

CIE prevented another government agency from getting access to its land as part of a "turf war" over a new Luas line, it has emerged.
The Railway Procurement Agency (RPA) had to ask former Transport Minister Martin Cullen to intercede on its behalf, at the Broadstone depot in Dublin, which is at the heart of competing plans for new rail services.
It is planning to extend the Luas line at St Stephen's Green to Liffey Junction, using the disused Broadstone railway route, but CIE wants to use it to connect with the re-opened Dublin-Navan railway line, as well as providing extra services on the Maynooth line.
According to documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, Mr Cullen had to write to CIE last April to plead for the RPA to be let in.


Mandate

"To enable the RPA discharge its mandate, it is necessary for it to access lands in the ownership of CIE for the purpose of survey and inspection. I would be grateful if you would personally ensure that the RPA is immediately given the necessary access to the relevant CIE lands, particularly at Broadstone."
CIE confirmed that the RPA had not been given access to its lands, pending clarification from the Department of Transport on the position of its own plans.
But a spokesman said the RPA had subsequently been allowed into the site several months ago.
Fine Gael senator Paschal Donohoe, who obtained the documents, claimed the extension of the Luas line to areas on the Northside, such as Phibsborough and Cabra, had been stalled by the row.
He raised concerns that Transport Minister Noel Dempsey was more committed to allowing the route to be used for the Dublin-Navan rail corridor, rather than for "Dublin's transport needs".
However, a spokeswoman for Mr Dempsey said that the claims were incorrect.

National interest

"There is a team of consultants who have carried out their own piece of work to recommend whether Broadstone should be used for light rail or heavy rail.
"They will be coming back to the minister in a matter of days."
She also said that in the Transport 21 plan, the route was designed for a Luas line, adding that the minister would make his decision based on the national, rather than the local, interest.
-
Michael Brennan Political Correspondent

Last edited by ThomasJ : 11-01-2008 at 15:27.
ThomasJ is offline  
Unread 11-01-2008, 17:33   #2
Derek Wheeler
Registered user
 
Derek Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kildare
Posts: 1,555
Default

Well MarkG?

You claimed it was baloney in the Navan scoping thread. Looks pretty conclusive to me.
Derek Wheeler is offline  
Unread 11-01-2008, 17:53   #3
packetswitch
Member
 
packetswitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 216
Default

I think you're both right. It seems that:

1. CIÉ refused access to the RPA (i.e. what actually happened). (Derek's post and the newspaper article)
2. The correct legal position appears to be that the RPA are entitled to access (i.e. what the law says). (Mark's post)
packetswitch is offline  
Unread 11-01-2008, 17:55   #4
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

RPA have had physical on site access in recent months
Mark Gleeson is offline  
Unread 12-01-2008, 12:29   #5
philip
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 632
Default

....but only after they went to the minister. CIE did initially block access according to the article.

The law says a lot of things. What happens in reality is often very different.
philip is offline  
Unread 12-01-2008, 13:26   #6
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

Hell of a lot quicker go to the minister as well

Going to the district court would cost more and take longer, but they have that legal right§
Mark Gleeson is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:13.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.