Rail Users Ireland Forum

Go Back   Rail Users Ireland Forum > Irish Rail Customer Service Issues > Commuter Services > All stops to Thurles
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 12-01-2009, 12:00   #1
bamurf
New to the board
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 8
Default Assorted ramblings of a new rail commuter

I'm one of the lucky ones, I now have a viable commuting option by rail from the newly opened station in Park West, which is about 3 minutes walk from my front door, to Hazelhatch, from where my employers provide a shuttle bus for the last bit of the journey. Because I take an out bound service in the morning and an in bound service in the evening, there are no crowds to contend with and there are always seats.

When the station opened in august, I started taking the train a few days a week. It meant leaving the house earlier in the morning and hanging around Hazelhatch for 15 to 20 minutes (through no fault of IR) but the real advantage comes in the evening where the limited service means I can't stay late because I have to go to get my train, there simply is no better excuse for getting out the door in the evening. Getting home at a guaranteed time every day is great. Getting out of the car also makes for a less stressful day, even though I never really had to encounter any nightmare traffic because of my reverse commute (outbound in the morning and inbound in the evening). That's the good bits covered, the ones that led me to sign up for an annual ticket, now for the ones that make me regret that decision...

1. Timetables v's Reality how can it be that the train is almost always late getting to the first stop out of Heuston? I can recall only one incident when it came on time since last august. Coincidently that happened when the clocks went back an hour in October. Are all of the clocks in IR so bad that the only time they align when they're synchronised in spring and autumn when the time changes, only to drift out of synch until the next changing of the clocks?
2. Timetables a major factor in my decision to purchase an annual ticket was the promised improved service for '09, alas the timetable was published just days after the cutoff date for ordering annual tickets and there was absolutely no change to the service. I'm stuck with a single viable train in the morning and the same in the evening, great for use as an excuse to leave work on time but some flexibility would be nice.
3. Annual Tickets my annual ticket came with a wallet to keep it safe so I placed my annual ticket in the wallet to keep it safe. The first time I took my annual ticket out of the wallet, a significant portion of the ink from the annual ticket was left on the inside of the damn wallet. Is it too much to ask that they either use an appropriate ink and media combination that will give a level of permenance equal to, or longer than the period the ticket is valid for? I have no doubt that a ticket inspector will question whether the photo on the ticket is really me before the end of the month, and who could blame them, it's next to impossible to tell already.
4. Rain Covers on Ticket Validating Machines You build a new train station, with a roof, inside which you put turnstyles (or what ever the correct terminology is) operated by automatic ticket validating machines. All perfectly fine and what you would expect in any normal country and from any normal rail company except IR have decided in their infinite wisdom that each of these ticket validating machines needs a rain cover, an ill fitting plastic shroud which the ticket crashes into each and every time it exits the machine. It's a nuissance with single tickets because the turnstyle does not open until you wrestle the ticket out but it's even worse for an obviously fragile annual ticket getting battered twice daily by this contraption. The whole thing smacks of utter incompetance.
Did they not specify the requirement for the roof to keep out the rain? Was it the failure of the architects, the builders, the contractors? Did they bother to snag the station? Did they consider treating the underlying cause rather than a symptom? Was there any clause in the contracts to force those responsible to rectify the roof? Even if it's not possible to treat the underlying cause, could they consider using a rain cover that did it's job without adversely impacting the functionality of the machine or put a canope over the machines instead of the stupid rain cover?
If this is the model for new stations, god help us all.

We downsized from two cars to one last august because we should have been able to survive with one combined with the train and bus services. I'm afraid that we're going to be returning to being a two car family very soon. I'll continue to use the train to commute to work when I can but I'm doubtful as to whether its worthwhile renewing my annual ticket next year, even with the tax breaks, it's reliant on how much use I make of the ticket outside of the daily commute for it to make financial sense. I wanted this to work but I'm left disappointed.
bamurf is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:17.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.