|
17-07-2020, 12:22 | #1 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
Quote:
http://eiretrains.com/Photo_Gallery/...yStations.html |
|
17-07-2020, 16:09 | #2 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cork-Dublin, Cork Commuter and occasionally DART and Dublin-Wexford
Posts: 855
|
I would have thought the last thing needed between Ennis and Athenry would be another station to slow services down more. At least with Moyross, you could serve it with trains only running between Limerick and Ennis.
Crusheen is small. For comparison's sake, this is a non-exhaustive list of towns, on or within 2km of a rail line, that are larger and don't have a station. Mountrath Kilmallock Buttevant Blarney Cratloe Caherconlish Mooncoin Mullinavat Newcastle Ferns Dunleer Castlebellingham A couple of observations about that list - There are way better candidates than Crusheen. Specifically, places that could drive commuter traffic, like Dunleer, Blarney or Newcastle. - In the absence of designated stopping services outside urban areas, we could kill the already poor timings on our rail network |
18-07-2020, 18:20 | #3 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
A halt wouldn’t do much harm if it was adjoining a PSR. Not sure if there is one in Crusheen. A station with a passing loop would inject flexibility into the timetable - but given the failure to build one straight away in Oranmore, to build one at all in Sixmilebridge, and the lifting of ones between Limerick Junction and Waterford, I don’t think we should hold our breath.
Moyross should have a 2 platform halt (“Musgrave Park/LIT”) and a single track one in Cratloe could be called “Bunratty (Cratloe)” Killonan could have had one if Limerick bothered to develop a town around the junction together with a decent link road to Plassey. Kilmallock is too close to Charleville; moving Charleville Station a bit north to be closer to Kilmallock’s catchment could work given that the existing station is remote, but with the loop it would likely be too expensive. Doubt Mountrath would see a halt for 1800 people on a high speed section of the line unless Ballybrophy was closed and the Nenagh branch was reoriented via Borris in Ossory and points north as a third main track into Portlaoise which seems a bit unlikely to me... |
20-07-2020, 21:06 | #4 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cork-Dublin, Cork Commuter and occasionally DART and Dublin-Wexford
Posts: 855
|
So the Cork proposals were presented to councilors this evening. It essentially amounts to five new stations (Blarney, Kilbarry, Dunkettle, Ballynoe, Carrigtwohill West) and electrification of the suburban rail network.
I don’t really understand why Ballynoe, which isn’t all that far from Rushbrooke and not Tivoli. Regarding the diverged discussion, I’d actually be in favour of some rural stopping services. Something like a route that ran:- Cork Blarney Mallow Buttevant Charleville Kilmallock Limerick junction Limerick P&R (somewhere near where the rail line crosses the M7) Limerick You could them eliminate Charleville from Cork-Dublin services, but provide a better service as a result. Connections with Dublin-Cork trains at Limerixk Junction can then feed that route. However, it’s clearly not an option unless the fleet gets significantly expanded. Maybe if there’s further electrification around Dublin, some diesel railcars may be available. Last edited by comcor : 20-07-2020 at 21:09. |
22-07-2020, 09:57 | #5 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cork-Dublin, Cork Commuter and occasionally DART and Dublin-Wexford
Posts: 855
|
So apparently dual-tracking to Midleton was also included. Seems like a bit of a waste to me when the current track can handle 4 trains per hour each way and the current peak hour service is only twice per hour. If needed four trains an hour with larger capacity seems sufficient in the next 20 years. That would be a three-fold capacity increase.
|
23-07-2020, 08:14 | #6 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
Normally Midleton and Cobh services are provided by 2-car DMUs. All platforms can take 4 cars without any alteration. So the capacity of the existing hourly service could be doubled without extra fixed assets, or quadrupled by moving to a 4-car 30-minute interval service. And I daresay that extra peak hour services might easily provide even more capacity.
For all of this you will need more rolling stock. More track capacity would be a total waste of money. Services in the Mallow direction are another matter. |
23-07-2020, 14:35 | #7 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
It should be doubled, its a very cheap investment. The alignment is available apart from one bridge however replacmentg that or not isn't really an issue. Give or take 30 million project. The line cost 75 to open.
Last edited by Jamie2k9 : 23-07-2020 at 14:38. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|