|
01-03-2017, 14:13 | #1 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sligo Line
Posts: 1,115
|
I'm loath to agree with Barry Kenny on anything, but this is actually a pretty positive development. A staff-member is lot more use to the travelling public providing customer service on board two Sligo train runs than they are sitting in a ticket office in Edgeworthstown for 7 hours and I say this as somebody who uses Edgeworthstown - I would much rather see the staff on the train.
|
09-03-2017, 11:30 | #2 | |
New to the board
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
Eh... there's nobody in the Edgeworthstown ticket office for most of the day. It opens about ten minutes before a train arrives. |
|
09-03-2017, 18:59 | #3 | ||||
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
On Waterford services you have some form of interaction with staff on a lot of services, there is 3/4 staff who operate on various services (usually one of peak morning/evening) and corresponding middle of day service and also two RPU staff who generally swap services en route. Cork are staffed with separate RPU and there is always a few staff staff who do Tralee/Limerick/Galway from time to time. What the network needs is some staff and a proper transport police division who in most cases could deal with 90% of problems driver only trains cause. The 45-60 minute wait for guards (not anyone's fault based on current set) is the core issue here and why to an extent, there is reluctance to get them unless it's really necessary. I do get the impression the staffing could be a rather seasonal thing, a little like those customer service staff they took on last summer for assisting in stations such as Heuston. Last edited by Jamie2k9 : 09-03-2017 at 19:03. |
||||
13-03-2017, 11:43 | #4 | |
New to the board
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
No idea where the staff live but there is nobody around and the office is locked except for 10-15 minutes before a train arrival. It's actually the schedule you posted that's just not true (imagine something like that from IE). |
|
13-03-2017, 16:16 | #5 | |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
Quote:
here is an example - two neighbours of mine, in their 50's, went to templemore last week to get the 6.30 train. they couldnt use the TVM because the floodlights in the carpark glared out the screen. lucky the ticket office was open, otherwise they'd be getting a nice fine at Heuston as there was nobody selling tickets on the train. |
|
13-03-2017, 17:54 | #6 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sligo Line
Posts: 1,115
|
You'll always find anecdotal evidence to support any viewpoint. Most people will chose the familiar if the option is available. If they were offered a tenner off the ticket for using the TVM, you'd probably find they would deal with the glare issue. You should also consider who answered your phone call about TVM use. The guy selling the tickets is hardly motivated to tell you that his job is done just as well by the machine.
The whole point of this discussion is about moving staff from stations onto trains. So if this change was made, there would be somebody on the train selling tickets - so no problem. Anyway, to repeat my question Is it not better that Irish Rail use what resources they have to properly staff trains rather than stations? |
13-03-2017, 19:12 | #7 | |||
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
Quote:
Quote:
I from time to time use the ticket office still. The Templemore problem should be raised with IE if it hasn't. Had they boarded without a ticket because of the issue it should of been easy to appeal in the event of a fine. I'm sure there could be a case made to continue to have stations staffed for the morning peak if really needed. Chances are most small stations employee 2-3 staff (no idea) so they surly is some flexibility around moving some to trains at times and keeping some in stations at times. Quote:
|
|||
14-03-2017, 10:10 | #8 |
New to the board
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 27
|
|
15-03-2017, 12:32 | #9 | |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
Quote:
"easy to appeal" is the sort of thing I say to clients, but its easy for me to say. For them its the feeling of anxiety for not being believed, frustration at being stopped and quizzed, then having the fine hanging over you and to be perfectly honest in our experience it is far form a given that IE will grant an appeal without forcing you to go to the court on it. We've seen many a letter/e mail from people who you'd think "well, they'll surely allow that one" and they dont - seemingly on policy. I am bemused by our societies utter faith and, in fact zealous advocacy for all things electronic over the human. Maybe it's just me. |
|
15-03-2017, 12:26 | #10 | |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
Quote:
if not, then no, they are better off in the stations. the TVM issue is separate, it was posted that because of TVM's the need for station staff is greatly reduced, but that is not necessarily the case, as a quick phone around showed. If you believe that the staff would lie about this, then I'm sure that when all this comes to the dreaded union/staff negotiations IE will have to produce actual TVM/Over the counter transaction figures. Besides, as I said before, why not have both? We are not talking massive amounts of staff here. Whilst I post in a personal capacity on the forum it is RUI policy that staff should be on site as much as possible, if for no other reason than your personal wellbeing/security and onsite means on trains and stations. At the end of the day IR say that they have implemented many practice changes with a view to getting the best value for money they can, but at the end of the day there is a limit. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|