|
11-10-2017, 14:53 | #1 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
Lets get one thing very straight about numbers
Target was 250k Ennis Athenry, 125-140k is the best done so far, this is a fact. Adding in Galway Athenry and Ennis Limerick is a classic smokescreen to inflate the numbers What is shocking is despite the 21st century infrastructure and automation its loss is still significant. Closing it doesn't really save much but it does save on the operating costs and requires minimal redundancies. Nenagh on the other hand what you are mainly saving is the future costs of major engineering works. There is a huge question of efficiency, we cannot fund a frequent all day commuter service to Longford, Athlone, Gorey, its mostly carrying air around apart from some demand in morning and evening, folks then complain they have no late night service etc. If you choose to live 80 miles away then you will only get a basic service. Thats not sustainable development we are actually encouraging people to build cheap one off houses in Longford and to spend 2 hours each way on a train, its not a way to live. Prior to the introduction of Longford Dublin it was Mullingar Dublin, 50 miles a reasonable cut off distance, there was a plan for a late evening post 9pm train, once the service got pushed out to Longford the evening train plan was scrapped as the numbers could no longer stack up.
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
11-10-2017, 17:21 | #2 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 117
|
WRC
[i]"What we have instead is a motorway plan which is not rooted in sound traffic management or sound financial management. That has been proven", and a plan estimated at €5.6 billion could now cost up to €20 billion.
Mr Sargent said that a trick employed by contractors had become systematic, where they put in a bid "low enough to get political support and once accepted the claims are maximised to ensure that the overrun is not 20 per cent over, which is the average internationally, but 86 per cent of the cost" Its interesting how some stress the capital cost of rail development particularly in cases where the infrastructure such as the permanent way is already in place like the WRC. Such infrastructure could not be purchased today yet its in the states hands and can be developed at a fraction of the price of roads. In terms of rail we must have the foresight to project forward. But for the fact that the Harcourt line permanent way was maintained the likelihood of the Luas line to Ranelagh and beyond might never have happened. Maintain the option and plan for a future that certainly will not be based on petrol/diesel cars or trucks. |
13-10-2017, 16:24 | #3 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 117
|
Athenry WRC map
https://www.google.ge/search?q=weste...K4VMLPjP6uY1M:
WRC has to be one of the best connected lines in the country intersecting with main line routes at Limerick, Athenry, Claremorris and Collooney. Athenry has just been named as the location for Apple info centre so having rail links will be an added attraction. |
13-10-2017, 20:06 | #4 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
Data centres look big, employ tiny numbers of people once built, could get by with less than 10 per shift
We can thank CIE for it since they laid a fibre optic cable along the WRC 15 years ago Really grappling for straws here
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
14-10-2017, 09:13 | #5 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 951
|
What Mark says about says Data Centres omits to include suppliers, outsourced support staff, building maintenance and others I can't immediately think of. The numbers employed in total may not be huge but there are other contributions including construction employment, support for renewable energy and conmercial rates. More importantly other employment and activity may follow in the area with obvious societal and region benefits.
As for the WRC, the case for completion may not be overwhelming but despite motorways Galway is a heavily congested city and both it and it's hinterland would benefit from improved regional rail links. The other key advantage of re-instating the Athenry to Galway line is that it would allow diversion of freight traffic destined for Waterford away from the Kildare bottleneck. |
14-10-2017, 10:34 | #6 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 36
|
|
14-10-2017, 12:08 | #7 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
Quote:
Yes divert via West of Ireland, and require 2 loco changes (?) and take just as long as current paths do. Not to mention the cost of manning Limerick J-Waterford to service the route combined with little spare capacity between Ennis-Limerick. The current schedules were designed to cut costs and don't have much impact. It would be cheaper to return to the evening runs at a 23.30-00.00 arrival and avoid any congestion at Kildare. |
|
15-10-2017, 12:21 | #8 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 951
|
There is some capacity between Ennis and Limerick and more could be added relatively easily, if required.
Why would there be a requirement for two locomotive changes on freight trains routed via the WRC. I can see that there might be one change but two ???? |
15-10-2017, 13:30 | #9 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
Quote:
Whatever way people try to dress up the business case, spending millions to divert 6 return workings per week doesn't and will never stack up. The project needs to be shelved, it would only for our unstable Goverment it's still been "talked" about. I can't see that changing if there is another election either. Last edited by Jamie2k9 : 15-10-2017 at 13:43. |
|
15-10-2017, 14:38 | #10 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 117
|
WRC
The reason WRC is important is that this is not about today and the six trains you mention, this is about the future.
Going on that logic the Harcourt line in Dublin should have been built on and there would never have been a Luas because putting that type of infrastructure in place today would be impossible. Brexit means Rosslare is more important and links to it by rail are a solution for the future. Ireland is obliged under UN sustainable goals 2030 to move away from car/truck petrol-diesel as all our fuel is imported. Electric trains will be the way to go. Dublin Cork line is too busy. |
15-10-2017, 20:34 | #11 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
Quote:
|
|
26-11-2017, 17:37 | #12 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 117
|
WRC future option
https://www.globalrailwayreview.com/...ght-track-uic/
"By 2050 it is expected that the majority of medium-distance passenger transport will be by rail". Thats the reason why the current generation should not make the same mistake as some of the previous political generation in IRE in dismantling rail infrastructure. The ideas that are coming for rail in the future are lighter and greener but having the permanent way in place is a huge advantage which in IRE is already the case like the Western Rail Corridor. |
14-08-2018, 18:41 | #13 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 117
|
Western Rail Corridor reopen
Huge increase in rail traffic according to Irish Examiner article in the past year indicating that ppl will drop the car if an alternative is available. Time to begin to reopen the like of WRC to Limerick and further south like Rosslare and Cork to take pressure off mainline and improve connectivity. Use the infrastructure that the ppl have paid for over years.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|