Rail Users Ireland Forum

Go Back   Rail Users Ireland Forum > General Information & Discussion > Events, Happenings and Media
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Unread 05-07-2007, 11:12   #1
ofjames
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blanch, Dublin
Posts: 81
Default Metro West Route

Minister Dempsey and Frank Allen are launching the selected Metro West route at lunchtime today. No news as of yet however. Im waiting for the barage of criticism of this project once its announced.....

http://www.rte.ie/news/2007/0705/metro.html
ofjames is offline  
Unread 05-07-2007, 12:56   #2
tomcosgrave
New to the board
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 10
Default

Looks like it's going to be Route 1 - it's serving Clondalkin...
http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/bre.../breaking2.htm
tomcosgrave is offline  
Unread 05-07-2007, 13:59   #3
comcor
Really Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cork-Dublin, Cork Commuter and occasionally DART and Dublin-Wexford
Posts: 855
Default

A bit late for thoughts like this now, but maybe it could have terminated in Howth and done away with the whole issue of splitting northern line services and providing a shuttle.
comcor is offline  
Unread 05-07-2007, 14:45   #4
clonsilladart
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 65
Default

Details can be found here

No real surprises.... The way it interconnects with the Maynooth and Kildare Lines will be Key!!!
The Porterstown Metro and Dart Stations should be built at the same time, thus optimising integration...... What are the odds???... 1000/1????
clonsilladart is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 12:28   #5
ofjames
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blanch, Dublin
Posts: 81
Default

in the literature surrounding metro west, it states that the tracks 'will be segregated from road traffic,' but then it also states that 'the trams will cross junctions in the same manner as luas.'

Can any of you guys reconcile these statements for me???
ofjames is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 12:46   #6
clonsilladart
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ofjames View Post
in the literature surrounding metro west, it states that the tracks 'will be segregated from road traffic,' but then it also states that 'the trams will cross junctions in the same manner as luas.'

Can any of you guys reconcile these statements for me???
I think what they mean is that "Metro"-West will have it's own alignment (not used by cars, as some of the Luas alignment is), but will cross over some junctions at Grade.

I personally think that anything that doesn't have it's own segregated alignment for 100% of the journey should not be called "Metro"!!!

Last edited by clonsilladart : 06-07-2007 at 12:49.
clonsilladart is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 13:16   #7
Thomas J Stamp
Chairman/Publicity
 
Thomas J Stamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
Default

It means that, because its being done on the cheap, the trams (that's what they are really) will run down the meridian of the Belgard Road and the Fonthill Road and also Blanchardstown Road South.

This, ladies and gentlemen, is LUAS West, not MetroWest.
__________________
We are the passengers
Thomas J Stamp is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 13:42   #8
ACustomer
Really Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
Default

What is it with the idiots who design transport systems in this country? The biggest mistake in building the M50 was the plethora of junctions which were not freeflow, now being put right at great expense. Howth Junction is an example of a rail junction which cries out for a flyover. Inadequate junctions and crossings may save money in the short run but they are totally destructive of capacity, especially at peak periods. Peak period congestion the Dublin's biggest transport problem. Will they ever learn?
ACustomer is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 13:57   #9
packetswitch
Member
 
packetswitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 216
Default

How about we just call it the Dublin Rail system (the whole lot, Luas, Metro, DART etc) and call the lines by colours or numbers or destinations or whatever and they just get on with building it before 2100?
packetswitch is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 15:06   #10
al2637
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 191
Default

The 51 in Amsterdam is regarded as a Metro, it is mostly segregated, yet crosses junctions and grade, doesn't seem to cause any problems. It's not as bad as it sounds guys.

I've always thought that this model would be ideal for Metro west!

http://www.urbanrail.net/eu/ams/amsterdm.htm (line 51)
al2637 is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 15:16   #11
Thomas J Stamp
Chairman/Publicity
 
Thomas J Stamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
Default

I've been on it. It's underground for a good stretch. This isn't.

Leaving that aside, the route is seriously flawed.
__________________
We are the passengers
Thomas J Stamp is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 15:19   #12
al2637
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 191
Default

5 stops out of 52 underground, maybe about 4km.
al2637 is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 15:20   #13
ofjames
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blanch, Dublin
Posts: 81
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas J Stamp View Post
the trams (that's what they are really) will run down the meridian of the Belgard Road and the Fonthill Road and also Blanchardstown Road South.
So you reckon it will run like the luas along the naas road?

From my local knowledge, given the vast amount of undeveloped land between ballycoolin and the airport, there should be no difficulty as regards segregating the line completely in that section of the route. The same goes for the section from when it crosses the N4 until the Porterstown interchange.

Section between porterstown and ballycoolin is tricky however. Theres space alongside the length of the blanchardstown road so that it could run in a segregated manner, however the two junctions it will cross at clonsilla rd and at the power city roundabout are busy. They should really be bridged.

I cant see any way how the line could be kept at grade yet kept away from traffic through the blanchardstown centre. Then theres the small matter of how it will cross the N3. It better get its own bridge!!

Any chance that the residents of tallaght, clondalkin, quarryvale and blanchardstown could kick up a helluva fuss and get this done right (as successfully done with metro north in ballymun?)

Also, agreed this project definitely seems to be far more similar to the tallaght luas line than the metro north. but is that such a bad thing? ( author prepares for onslaught)
ofjames is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 15:27   #14
Mark
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern line
Posts: 1,311
Default

It's all about Densities. Densities warrent and equalise the cost of tunnelling. City centre = high density and no space. West Dublin = mixture of high and low density with plenty of room for surface and elevated running.

When comparing metro in Dublin to international systems please dont mention London, Paris, Moscow etc. They are on a different planet in this regard. Compare like with like.
Mark is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 16:06   #15
a_slight_hitch
Member
 
a_slight_hitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas J Stamp View Post
Leaving that aside, the route is seriously flawed.
In what sense?

I'd like to see a response to this post:

http://forum.platform11.org/showpost...1&postcount=56

as it raises several good points. With the information in the public demain as my only source of knowledge I'm unable to see how your assertion is the case. Perhaps the fact that it is not full metro to start with is a flaw in the project, but the route itself seems to join all the necessary dots.
a_slight_hitch is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 16:15   #16
Thomas J Stamp
Chairman/Publicity
 
Thomas J Stamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
Default

I'll have to be brief, because its nearly time to go home.

Here are three reasons:

1. It is not properly connected to The Square Shopping Centre and it doesnt Connect with the LUAS there

2. It doesnt serve Liffey Valley SC nor it associated Retail Parks at all.

3. There are serious problems in the way it is planned to serve Blanchardstown Shopping Centre.

Bonus reason:

It doesnt serve James Connolly Hospital.

Longer and more detailed discussion is being held in the members section. I can fell the righteous finger of Mark Gleeson waiting to lock this thread as infrastructural debate is held there, but I'm not locking it because you will need to reply to this.

As for ofjames post, there were many responses to it, all of which anticipated what I have just said, most of which has been borne out to be correct.
__________________
We are the passengers
Thomas J Stamp is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 16:56   #17
ofjames
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blanch, Dublin
Posts: 81
Default

Fair point regarding JCM hospital, it doesnt serve Blanchardstown Institute of Technology either.

Students of BIT travelling via metro west will have to disembark at the NAC and take their chance walking through some of the toughest estates in the country. Wouldnt envy them!!

It would be possible to serve the hospital if a stop was located at the roundabout at the southern end of snugborough rd north (just after the bridge over the N3). Theres a road entrance to the hospital there, would be less than 10min walk to the front door of A&E
ofjames is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 19:11   #18
a_slight_hitch
Member
 
a_slight_hitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas J Stamp View Post
1. It is not properly connected to The Square Shopping Centre and it doesnt Connect with the LUAS there.
ok - have to admit I'm not particularly familiar with the area but my reading of the map published yesterday is that the LUAS connects to Metro via track laid between Tallaght and Tallaght East.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas J Stamp View Post
2. It doesnt serve Liffey Valley SC nor it associated Retail Parks at all.
right - do you mean it doesn't serve Liffey Valley SC in the same way that Balally doesn't serve Dundrum TC on the Green Line? Again from the map published yesterday and a cursory glance at the aul' google maps the proposed stop would seem roughly similar distance away as Balally and Dundrum TC. My experience with Dundrum is that it's a minor pain in the hole when it's raining but very accessible in general terms. Pardon my ignorance again but am not particularly familiar with the Liffey Valley area.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas J Stamp View Post
3. There are serious problems in the way it is planned to serve Blanchardstown Shopping Centre.
please elaborate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas J Stamp View Post
Bonus reason:

It doesnt serve James Connolly Hospital.
fair enough - although because of it's proximity to Blanchardstown TC it may have been a choice between the 2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas J Stamp View Post
As for ofjames post, there were many responses to it, all of which anticipated what I have just said, most of which has been borne out to be correct.
No there wasn't. The reason I linked to the ofjames post was because the thread ended 1 post later and I couldn't find any satisfactory responses anywhere else. It's a bit picky I know but check the thread.
a_slight_hitch is offline  
Unread 06-07-2007, 19:26   #19
philip
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ofjames View Post
Fair point regarding JCM hospital, it doesnt serve Blanchardstown Institute of Technology either.
The latter being the bigger trip generator I'd have thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ofjames View Post
Students of BIT travelling via metro west will have to disembark at the NAC and take their chance walking through some of the toughest estates in the country. Wouldnt envy them!!
Surely metro West will gentrify these estates and all will be well. I'm sure I saw it that way in an artists impression!
philip is offline  
Unread 09-07-2007, 09:17   #20
Thomas J Stamp
Chairman/Publicity
 
Thomas J Stamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
Default

Just like A Slight Hitch, I hate to nitpick.

But, you admit you don't know the area, well I do. Once you know the on the ground situation you will understand the problems i have pointed out and all the gazing at Google Maps and comparing with a LUAS line somewhere else is no substitute.

As for ofjames' points my reply above addresses them.

As for elaboration, it's elaborated upon in the members section discussion.
__________________
We are the passengers
Thomas J Stamp is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:51.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.