![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern line
Posts: 1,311
|
![]() The Bombardier units of the Rotterdam metro have been shown a few times on RPA material so they are also an option:
http://www.amsterdamsetram.nl/nieuw/...rddrenth13.jpg http://www.53a-pix.co.uk/picture/Metro1-RO-041102.jpg Bombardier have also completed the units for Randstad Rail which could be similair to what we could expect: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ieuwe_RSG3.jpg Remember that Metro North is only 2.4m (to be compatible with Luas) and not the recommended 2.65m or 2.8m widths that nearly all metro systems, light or heavy, are using. For comparison the Rotterdam, Porto and Seville are 2.65m wide (tram width) systems. More than likely the decision to those two consortiums came down to money, money and money. The financial security of the consortiums were an issue too no doubt. Last edited by Mark : 01-07-2009 at 14:56. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() The operations side of both are very decent, one runs the Metro in Paris the other runs the incredibly well run Hong Kong metro system and has a 50/50 stake in a UK rail venture.
We did meet with one of the two failed bidders a while a back
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|