Rail Users Ireland Forum

Go Back   Rail Users Ireland Forum > General Information & Discussion > Events, Happenings and Media
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Unread 21-12-2006, 10:17   #1
Mark Hennessy
Membership Officer
 
Mark Hennessy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 1,116
Default Economics "Expert" reviews T21

From the Irish Times

Quote:
Transport 21 plan flawed, says expert

Ciarán Brennan

Transport 21, the Government's capital investment programme for the transport system over the next 10 years, is a flawed document which lacks published economic analysis to support the large public expenditure it envisages, according to Dr Seán Barrett of the economics department of Trinity College.

"Individual projects are not costed, but bundled to cost €34.4 billion," said Dr Barrett.

"There is no cost benefit analysis. It ignores all the market alternatives, such as how much cheaper bus fares are where you have competition, and it is remarkably sanguine about the huge cost of over-runs on all the construction projects. There is no mechanism in there to get value for money."

It does not take into account the Comptroller and Auditor General's analysis of the large cost over-runs on national road investment between 2000 and 2006, which had a €10.8 billion over-run on an initial cost estimate of €5.6 billion, he said.

In a review of Transport 21, Dr Barrett, said it shows the lack of any evaluation culture in the Department of Transport and its spending agencies.

"You've got to break it into individual projects and say what they will cost and you've got to have much stricter monitoring," he said.

"It misses the criteria for economic effectiveness and efficiency pretty well at every stage, and it is not the kind of thinking that should underpin the new national development plan to be launched next month."

The rail emphasis in Transport 21 lacks economic appraisals of projects such as the Airport-Swords metro, the Tallaght-Ballymun metro, the Lucan Luas and the Dublin interconnector, he said.

Dr Barrett also said that it had no consumer focus. Competitive bus services are invariably cheaper and more frequent than railways, but Transport 21 ignores the unused capacity of quality bus corridors in Dublin but opts for rail-based solutions for 155 million of the 175 million extra passengers it seeks to attract to public transport, he said.

It ignores the low market shares, high costs, declining productivity and declining yields from rail transport, he said.
© 2006 The Irish Times
Mark Hennessy is offline  
Unread 21-12-2006, 10:45   #2
TomB
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Limerick
Posts: 207
Default

I have to admit I never thought Sean Barrett was the best bloke in the world after he fined me £50 as Junior Dean for having an unauthorised party on Trinity campus years ago.

But that prejudice aside, I do wish he would stop talking like one of those 18 year-olds with bad haircuts who have just joined the young PDs because their leaving cert economics teacher told them that prices tend to drop under perfect competition.

The important word here is *perfect* competition. Bus services can never be subject to perfect competition because it would be a mess. Sure we need more stringent economic analysis for T21 projects. And we need publication of the analyses that have already been done. But stop saying that buses and competition are a panacea for public transport in Dublin because there's no precedent for that anywhere in the world.

And spare us the leaving cert economics lecture. And if you really don't realise that public transport is a far more complex economic situation than widgets, then maybe you'd better get back to telling students off for having fun. I hear that a certain Mr. Gleeson might have a banned set of fairy lights which you might want to look in to...
TomB is offline  
Unread 21-12-2006, 10:58   #3
Thomas J Stamp
Chairman/Publicity
 
Thomas J Stamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
Default

Is this his take on the ESRI report I heard about this morning?

Why didnt he look at our costings? It may have saved him some effort.

I mean he could have looked here:

http://platform11.org/transport21/costs.php
__________________
We are the passengers
Thomas J Stamp is offline  
Unread 21-12-2006, 11:15   #4
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

I'm sick of Sean Barrett

Remember this is the guy who wants to close the entire rail network and sell it off to developers

Of course Dr Barrett gets the train

Of course passenger numbers are up 10% per annum but costs are increasing at a lower rate so the yield is increasing while the cost to the state is reducing. The 70 million extra rail passengers are cost neutral

There is a solid ecomomic evaluation for the Swords metro, I know you can download it off the dail website
Mark Gleeson is offline  
Unread 21-12-2006, 23:23   #5
Derek Wheeler
Registered user
 
Derek Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kildare
Posts: 1,555
Default

The producer of the Last Word on Today Fm rang me about this today. I wasn't happy with the comments in relation to rail. Apparently Barry Kenny wasn't happy with it either. The last I heard was that Sean Barret couldn't be contacted to go on air and the piece fell apart.

How a person who condemned the DART as a waste of money, can still get space in a newspaper with irresponsible and blatantly biasedcomments is beyond me. Oh...sorry its not...its the letters after your name that lend credance. In that case Im am hereby known as .......

Derek Wheeler. S.O.T.S.O.S.F.S.C.E.E.

(Sick Of The Same Old ****e From So Called Experts, EXPERT.)
Derek Wheeler is offline  
Unread 21-12-2006, 23:38   #6
Mark Hennessy
Membership Officer
 
Mark Hennessy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 1,116
Default

The thing is Barrett must have so much time on his hands because he's not producing much material of academic interest to his international peers.
Looking at his publications, it has been over 3 years since he has had work published in an international journal.
So he knows he can drum up a bit of local publicity by a bit of tried and trusted rail bashing.

Last edited by Mark Hennessy : 21-12-2006 at 23:44.
Mark Hennessy is offline  
Unread 22-12-2006, 00:15   #7
Dave
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 141
Default

What age is he? Any chance of him retiring soon?
Dave is offline  
Unread 22-12-2006, 10:23   #8
Ronald Binge
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 112
Default

Dr. Barrett cites the AerDart as an indicator of possible demand for a rail link to the Airport.

He conveniently forgets that standing around outside Howth Junction station in the wind and rain waiting for a bus that comes roughly every fifteen to twenty minutes doesn't encourage repeat business.

I fully expect Kevin Myers to come weighing in with a repeat of his Irish Times column advocating the ripping up of the Sligo line and replacing it with a busway.
Ronald Binge is offline  
Unread 22-12-2006, 10:50   #9
Mark Hennessy
Membership Officer
 
Mark Hennessy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 1,116
Default

If you look at all of his international publications of note, they focus primarily on aviation and in particular airports.
From my search, I cannot find one international peer-reviewed journal publication by Sean Barrett about railways, so I'd like to know where he can claim authority on the subject.
Mark Hennessy is offline  
Unread 22-12-2006, 11:06   #10
Colm Donoghue
Really Regular Poster
 
Colm Donoghue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 873
Default

He works in Trinity. It's the only University in Dublin with a railway line.

Obvious qualification there. What more do you need?
Colm Donoghue is offline  
Unread 22-12-2006, 11:11   #11
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

And he is a rail commuter

From what I know he is in his late 50's he just hates state owned companies

End of the day Luas beat all expectations, DART was ahead of any expectations

For instance the Maynooth line had a 30% increase in passengers 2005 vs 2006, we have the fastest growing railway in Europe and its ahead of target we should have broken the 40 million barrier this week back in 1980 its was a little over 10 million
Mark Gleeson is offline  
Unread 22-12-2006, 13:36   #12
seamus kilcock
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 103
Default Dr Sean Barrett

This is the same Dr Barrett who 20 years ago, when Knock airport opened, rubbished its existance.
Was it he who described it as a useless bit of concrete built on a foggy boggy hill - or words to that effect.
Knock Airport is paying for itself and is of immense value to the pople of West and North West Connacht. Dr Sean Barrett has been proven wrong yet again -no surprise there.
Frankly Dr Barrett is an academic who has proven to be wrong time and time again in his pronouncements on transport matters in Ireland during the last 20 plus years.
I wish the media would treat him with the contempt he deserves - ignore him.
Let all of us ignore him from now on.
seamus kilcock is offline  
Unread 22-12-2006, 20:17   #13
Derek Wheeler
Registered user
 
Derek Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kildare
Posts: 1,555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seamus kilcock View Post
I wish the media would treat him with the contempt he deserves - ignore him.
Let all of us ignore him from now on.

Bravo!

Thread locked.
Derek Wheeler is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:01.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.